header-logo header-logo

Direct ABS?

17 July 2013
Issue: 7569 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

 Direct Line Group & Parabis Law apply to set up ABS

Insurance company Direct Line Group and Parabis Law have applied to set up an alternative business structure (ABS), DLG Legal Services, offering before-the-event (BTE) legal insurance for personal injury, non-injury claims, employment, debt recovery and contract issues.

Existing Direct Line, Churchill, Privilege and other partner brands motor and family legal expenses insurance policyholders will receive 100% of any damages awarded. Customers will be able to choose their own solicitor. New customers will agree a standalone fee for their case under which the fee will be deducted from any damages won.

Parabis was the first ABS to secure private equity backing, with Duke Street taking over half the firm last year.

Issue: 7569 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll