header-logo header-logo

11 January 2013
Issue: 7543 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Disability discrimination

R (on the application of Coleman) v Barnet London Borough Council [2012] EWHC 3725 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 256 (Dec)

The duty under s 149 of the Equality Act 2010 was not a duty to achieve a result, but to have due regard to the need to achieve the statutory goals. The court had to consider whether due regard had been paid to the equality duty and not simply whether the failure to have due regard to that duty was Wednesbury unreasonable. “Due” regard meant the regard that was appropriate in all the circumstances. The circumstances included the importance of the areas of life of the members of the disadvantaged group that were affected by the inequality of opportunity and the extent of the inequality, and such countervailing factors as were relevant to the function which the decision-maker was performing. Where disabilities were concerned, the duty encompassed due regard being given to the need to take steps to gather relevant information in order that the authority could properly take steps to take into account disabled persons’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll