header-logo header-logo

Disarming litigation terrorists

John Fordham explains how devastating freezing injunctions can be

The world of litigation was, for a short period, in grave danger. Its most powerful weapon, the worldwide freezing (Mareva) injunction, had fallen into the wrong hands.

To English litigation lawyers, a worldwide freezing injunction is known as the nuclear weapon in the litigation armoury. Only English and a few like-minded courts have the jurisdiction to grant these very powerful orders. Courts on the continent of Europe do not, neither do courts in the US.

A Denning Creation

The weapon was first fashioned by one of the greatest English judges of the second half of the last century, Lord Denning. One of his relevant decisions concerned a ship called the Mareva which gave its name to Lord Denning's piece of litigation hardware. Commonwealth countries and others followed suit. Subsequently, it was given a statutory basis. Most recently, and regrettably, there has been an attempt to abolish the Mareva name in favour of the allegedly more plain English “freezing injunction”. But, Mareva

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll