header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011 / Steven O'Sullivan
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Disclosure or discretion?

How closely should solicitors guard a purchaser’s file from the lender? Steven O’Sullivan reports

Recession and falling property prices bring repossessions, even with historically low interest rates. Lenders who sell property at a loss inevitably look to see if there is any way to recoup those losses. The buyer’s solicitor (who normally acts for the lender too), with compulsory professional indemnity insurance, is an obvious target. The first step is to request the solicitor’s file. How should a solicitor respond to such a request? Should the file be handed over lock, stock and barrel?

The default position is that, absent the borrower’s consent or prima facie evidence of borrower fraud, the solicitor should not disclose the parts of the file that are privileged and/or confidential to the borrower. See para 8(c) of the SRA’s Guidance to rule 4 of the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 2007 and Nationwide BS v Various Solicitors [1999] PNLR52, per Blackburne J who held that “it was the lawyer’s duty to claim privilege on behalf of the client or former

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll