header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011 / Steven O'Sullivan
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Disclosure or discretion?

How closely should solicitors guard a purchaser’s file from the lender? Steven O’Sullivan reports

Recession and falling property prices bring repossessions, even with historically low interest rates. Lenders who sell property at a loss inevitably look to see if there is any way to recoup those losses. The buyer’s solicitor (who normally acts for the lender too), with compulsory professional indemnity insurance, is an obvious target. The first step is to request the solicitor’s file. How should a solicitor respond to such a request? Should the file be handed over lock, stock and barrel?

The default position is that, absent the borrower’s consent or prima facie evidence of borrower fraud, the solicitor should not disclose the parts of the file that are privileged and/or confidential to the borrower. See para 8(c) of the SRA’s Guidance to rule 4 of the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 2007 and Nationwide BS v Various Solicitors [1999] PNLR52, per Blackburne J who held that “it was the lawyer’s duty to claim privilege on behalf of the client or former

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll