header-logo header-logo

Disclosure or discretion?

03 February 2011 / Steven O'Sullivan
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

How closely should solicitors guard a purchaser’s file from the lender? Steven O’Sullivan reports

Recession and falling property prices bring repossessions, even with historically low interest rates. Lenders who sell property at a loss inevitably look to see if there is any way to recoup those losses. The buyer’s solicitor (who normally acts for the lender too), with compulsory professional indemnity insurance, is an obvious target. The first step is to request the solicitor’s file. How should a solicitor respond to such a request? Should the file be handed over lock, stock and barrel?

The default position is that, absent the borrower’s consent or prima facie evidence of borrower fraud, the solicitor should not disclose the parts of the file that are privileged and/or confidential to the borrower. See para 8(c) of the SRA’s Guidance to rule 4 of the Solicitors’ Code of Conduct 2007 and Nationwide BS v Various Solicitors [1999] PNLR52, per Blackburne J who held that “it was the lawyer’s duty to claim privilege on behalf of the client or former

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll