header-logo header-logo

Discount risk

28 September 2017
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_7763_chamberlayne

Changing the personal injury discount rate to take account of risky investors means leaving some seriously injured people under-compensated, a senior solicitor has warned. The discount rate, which is used to calculate lifelong compensation for the seriously injured, changed from 2.5% to -0.75% in March and is under review.

Writing in NLJ this week, Julian Chamberlayne, partner at Stewarts and Chairman of the Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors, says rhetoric from the insurance industry has focused on the fact some claimants will be over-compensated. Owing to the many variables involved, the flipside is that some claimants will be under-compensated. Chamberlayne questions whether this is acceptable, given the justice system aims to provide 100% compensation to successful claimants.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll