header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Discount risk

nlj_7763_chamberlayne

Changing the personal injury discount rate to take account of risky investors means leaving some seriously injured people under-compensated, a senior solicitor has warned. The discount rate, which is used to calculate lifelong compensation for the seriously injured, changed from 2.5% to -0.75% in March and is under review.

Writing in NLJ this week, Julian Chamberlayne, partner at Stewarts and Chairman of the Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors, says rhetoric from the insurance industry has focused on the fact some claimants will be over-compensated. Owing to the many variables involved, the flipside is that some claimants will be under-compensated. Chamberlayne questions whether this is acceptable, given the justice system aims to provide 100% compensation to successful claimants.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll