header-logo header-logo

Disenfranchised in the EU

23 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

White & Case partner Jacquelyn MacLennan and WWII veteran Harry Shindler have had their bid for the right to vote in the EU referendum rejected by the Court of Appeal.

Both are UK citizens but ineligible to vote on 23 June under UK electoral law as they have lived overseas for more than 15 years. MacLennan has lived in Brussels since 1987 while Shindler has lived in Italy for 35 years.

They claimed the 15-year rule was an unjustified restriction on their rights of free movement in that it penalised them for exercising their right to move and reside in another member state. They argued that it was contrary to their common law constitutional right to vote and prevented them voting on an issue which might bring to an end the very EU law rights on which they rely and base their working and private lives every day.

The Divisional Court held that it was bound by R (Preston) v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2013] QB 687, which meant the claimants must show the rule was liable to dissuade them from continuing to exercise their right of free movement.

Ruling in Shindler & Anor v Duchy of Lancaster [2016] EWCA Civ this week, Lord Dyson, the Master of the Rolls said he regarded as “hopeless” the argument that the court has “a discretionary power at common law to declare legislation unconstitutional where it conflicts with fundamental constitutional rights such as the right to vote”. He further held that s 2 of the EU Referendum Act 2015 did not fall within the scope of EU Law and, even if it did, “the effect on the class as a whole is too uncertain, indirect and/or insignificant to amount to a restriction on their rights of free movement”.

However, the Supreme Court will hear the case at an emergency hearing next week. Up to two million British citizens living in EU member states fall under the 15-year rule. The deadline to register to vote is 7 June.

MacLennan says: “Brexit would have a huge impact on my personal and professional life. Excluding 2 million citizens like me from voting—as the government recognises—is unjust and unfair.” 

Leigh Day solicitors, who acted for the pair, pointed out that the Conservative 2015 manifesto and the 2015 and 2016 Queen’s Speeches included the pledge to introduce votes for life, scrapping the rule that bars British citizens who have lived abroad for more than 15 years from voting.

Shindler says: “The government had agreed to scrap the 15 year rule before the Referendum Bill was passed agreeing it was arbitrary and undemocratic.”

Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll