header-logo header-logo

23 May 2016
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Disenfranchised in the EU

White & Case partner Jacquelyn MacLennan and WWII veteran Harry Shindler have had their bid for the right to vote in the EU referendum rejected by the Court of Appeal.

Both are UK citizens but ineligible to vote on 23 June under UK electoral law as they have lived overseas for more than 15 years. MacLennan has lived in Brussels since 1987 while Shindler has lived in Italy for 35 years.

They claimed the 15-year rule was an unjustified restriction on their rights of free movement in that it penalised them for exercising their right to move and reside in another member state. They argued that it was contrary to their common law constitutional right to vote and prevented them voting on an issue which might bring to an end the very EU law rights on which they rely and base their working and private lives every day.

The Divisional Court held that it was bound by R (Preston) v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2013] QB 687, which meant the claimants must show the rule was liable to dissuade them from continuing to exercise their right of free movement.

Ruling in Shindler & Anor v Duchy of Lancaster [2016] EWCA Civ this week, Lord Dyson, the Master of the Rolls said he regarded as “hopeless” the argument that the court has “a discretionary power at common law to declare legislation unconstitutional where it conflicts with fundamental constitutional rights such as the right to vote”. He further held that s 2 of the EU Referendum Act 2015 did not fall within the scope of EU Law and, even if it did, “the effect on the class as a whole is too uncertain, indirect and/or insignificant to amount to a restriction on their rights of free movement”.

However, the Supreme Court will hear the case at an emergency hearing next week. Up to two million British citizens living in EU member states fall under the 15-year rule. The deadline to register to vote is 7 June.

MacLennan says: “Brexit would have a huge impact on my personal and professional life. Excluding 2 million citizens like me from voting—as the government recognises—is unjust and unfair.” 

Leigh Day solicitors, who acted for the pair, pointed out that the Conservative 2015 manifesto and the 2015 and 2016 Queen’s Speeches included the pledge to introduce votes for life, scrapping the rule that bars British citizens who have lived abroad for more than 15 years from voting.

Shindler says: “The government had agreed to scrap the 15 year rule before the Referendum Bill was passed agreeing it was arbitrary and undemocratic.”

Issue: 7700 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll