header-logo header-logo

Disorder & a delayed discovery

16 May 2019 / Michael Ashdown
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Costs
printer mail-detail

The late emergence of a will won’t trump the costs consequences of inactivity & non co-operation, as Michael Ashdown explains

  • If litigation over a deceased’s estate is caused by the poor state in which the deceased’s papers were left, the parties’ costs should be borne by the estate.

The recent case of Gaskin v Chorus Law Ltd and another [2019] EWHC 616 (Ch) is important in terms of how to deal with the costs implications of the late discovery of a will which affects ongoing proceedings.

The deceased died in June 2012. She was apparently intestate and left a residential property worth £320,000 and about £70,000 in bank and building society accounts and shares. A few months later, the claimant son of the deceased and the second defendant, who was the deceased’s daughter, instructed the first defendant probate company as personal representative of the deceased’s estate. The second defendant executed a power of attorney in favour of the first defendant, which obtained letters of administration expressed to be for the second defendant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll