header-logo header-logo

16 May 2019 / Michael Ashdown
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Costs
printer mail-detail

Disorder & a delayed discovery

The late emergence of a will won’t trump the costs consequences of inactivity & non co-operation, as Michael Ashdown explains

  • If litigation over a deceased’s estate is caused by the poor state in which the deceased’s papers were left, the parties’ costs should be borne by the estate.

The recent case of Gaskin v Chorus Law Ltd and another [2019] EWHC 616 (Ch) is important in terms of how to deal with the costs implications of the late discovery of a will which affects ongoing proceedings.

The deceased died in June 2012. She was apparently intestate and left a residential property worth £320,000 and about £70,000 in bank and building society accounts and shares. A few months later, the claimant son of the deceased and the second defendant, who was the deceased’s daughter, instructed the first defendant probate company as personal representative of the deceased’s estate. The second defendant executed a power of attorney in favour of the first defendant, which obtained letters of administration expressed to be for the second defendant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll