header-logo header-logo

16 May 2019 / Michael Ashdown
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Costs
printer mail-detail

Disorder & a delayed discovery

The late emergence of a will won’t trump the costs consequences of inactivity & non co-operation, as Michael Ashdown explains

  • If litigation over a deceased’s estate is caused by the poor state in which the deceased’s papers were left, the parties’ costs should be borne by the estate.

The recent case of Gaskin v Chorus Law Ltd and another [2019] EWHC 616 (Ch) is important in terms of how to deal with the costs implications of the late discovery of a will which affects ongoing proceedings.

The deceased died in June 2012. She was apparently intestate and left a residential property worth £320,000 and about £70,000 in bank and building society accounts and shares. A few months later, the claimant son of the deceased and the second defendant, who was the deceased’s daughter, instructed the first defendant probate company as personal representative of the deceased’s estate. The second defendant executed a power of attorney in favour of the first defendant, which obtained letters of administration expressed to be for the second defendant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll