header-logo header-logo

Disorder & a delayed discovery

16 May 2019 / Michael Ashdown
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Costs
printer mail-detail

The late emergence of a will won’t trump the costs consequences of inactivity & non co-operation, as Michael Ashdown explains

  • If litigation over a deceased’s estate is caused by the poor state in which the deceased’s papers were left, the parties’ costs should be borne by the estate.

The recent case of Gaskin v Chorus Law Ltd and another [2019] EWHC 616 (Ch) is important in terms of how to deal with the costs implications of the late discovery of a will which affects ongoing proceedings.

The deceased died in June 2012. She was apparently intestate and left a residential property worth £320,000 and about £70,000 in bank and building society accounts and shares. A few months later, the claimant son of the deceased and the second defendant, who was the deceased’s daughter, instructed the first defendant probate company as personal representative of the deceased’s estate. The second defendant executed a power of attorney in favour of the first defendant, which obtained letters of administration expressed to be for the second defendant’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll