header-logo header-logo

Dispelling the s 21 myths

07 March 2014 / Mathew McDermott
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
web_mcdermott

A recent Court of Appeal ruling provides important clarification on the validity of s 21 notices, as Mathew McDermott reports

Sometimes, albeit rarely, certain legal phrases and concepts filter their way down into the awareness of the general public. One that seems to have done so successfully is “the s 21 notice”—the notice, emanating from s 21 of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988), that you use when seeking possession of a dwelling that was let on an assured shorthold tenancy.

What “everyone” knows about these s 21 notices is that they involve giving the tenant two months’ notice in writing to leave the property before you take formal possession proceedings. A further well understood aspect of s 21 notices is that they come in two forms depending on whether or not the tenancy is in its fixed term or, this having expired, has entered a periodic term.

If you serve the notice during the fixed term the requirements are not as demanding: two months’ notice in writing. This is in s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll