header-logo header-logo

Dispute resolution clauses: lessons to be learned

29 January 2021 / Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail
37596
Staying proceedings & dispute resolution clauses, explored by Masood Ahmed
  • The nature of dispute resolution clauses.
  • The lessons to be learned from a number of recent decisions.

Dispute resolution clauses (also referred to as tiered dispute resolution clauses or escalation clauses) are becoming increasingly common in commercial agreements and it is clear that the courts will uphold and enforce such clauses.

Nature of dispute resolution clauses

Dispute resolution clauses typically require the parties to exhaust various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures before they are permitted to commence court or arbitration proceedings and the courts have recognised and enforced dispute resolution clauses (Cable & Wireless Plc v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2002] EWHC 2059 (Comm), [2002] 2 All ER (Comm) 1041). In Holloway v Chancery Mead Ltd [2007] EWHC 2495 (TCC), [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 653 Mr Justice Ramsey helpfully identified three procedural requirements for dispute resolution clauses to be enforceable:

  • the process must be sufficiently certain;
  • the administrative processes for selecting a party to resolve
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll