header-logo header-logo

29 January 2021 / Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail

Dispute resolution clauses: lessons to be learned

37596
Staying proceedings & dispute resolution clauses, explored by Masood Ahmed
  • The nature of dispute resolution clauses.
  • The lessons to be learned from a number of recent decisions.

Dispute resolution clauses (also referred to as tiered dispute resolution clauses or escalation clauses) are becoming increasingly common in commercial agreements and it is clear that the courts will uphold and enforce such clauses.

Nature of dispute resolution clauses

Dispute resolution clauses typically require the parties to exhaust various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures before they are permitted to commence court or arbitration proceedings and the courts have recognised and enforced dispute resolution clauses (Cable & Wireless Plc v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2002] EWHC 2059 (Comm), [2002] 2 All ER (Comm) 1041). In Holloway v Chancery Mead Ltd [2007] EWHC 2495 (TCC), [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 653 Mr Justice Ramsey helpfully identified three procedural requirements for dispute resolution clauses to be enforceable:

  • the process must be sufficiently certain;
  • the administrative processes for selecting a party to
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll