header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 January 2021 / Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail

Dispute resolution clauses: lessons to be learned

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
37596
Staying proceedings & dispute resolution clauses, explored by Masood Ahmed
  • The nature of dispute resolution clauses.
  • The lessons to be learned from a number of recent decisions.

Dispute resolution clauses (also referred to as tiered dispute resolution clauses or escalation clauses) are becoming increasingly common in commercial agreements and it is clear that the courts will uphold and enforce such clauses.

Nature of dispute resolution clauses

Dispute resolution clauses typically require the parties to exhaust various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures before they are permitted to commence court or arbitration proceedings and the courts have recognised and enforced dispute resolution clauses (Cable & Wireless Plc v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2002] EWHC 2059 (Comm), [2002] 2 All ER (Comm) 1041). In Holloway v Chancery Mead Ltd [2007] EWHC 2495 (TCC), [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 653 Mr Justice Ramsey helpfully identified three procedural requirements for dispute resolution clauses to be enforceable:

  • the process must be sufficiently certain;
  • the administrative processes for selecting a party to
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll