header-logo header-logo

Dispute resolution clauses: lessons to be learned

29 January 2021 / Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail
37596
Staying proceedings & dispute resolution clauses, explored by Masood Ahmed
  • The nature of dispute resolution clauses.
  • The lessons to be learned from a number of recent decisions.

Dispute resolution clauses (also referred to as tiered dispute resolution clauses or escalation clauses) are becoming increasingly common in commercial agreements and it is clear that the courts will uphold and enforce such clauses.

Nature of dispute resolution clauses

Dispute resolution clauses typically require the parties to exhaust various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures before they are permitted to commence court or arbitration proceedings and the courts have recognised and enforced dispute resolution clauses (Cable & Wireless Plc v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2002] EWHC 2059 (Comm), [2002] 2 All ER (Comm) 1041). In Holloway v Chancery Mead Ltd [2007] EWHC 2495 (TCC), [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 653 Mr Justice Ramsey helpfully identified three procedural requirements for dispute resolution clauses to be enforceable:

  • the process must be sufficiently certain;
  • the administrative processes for selecting a party to resolve
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll