header-logo header-logo

Dispute resolution clauses: lessons to be learned

29 January 2021 / Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7918 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail
37596
Staying proceedings & dispute resolution clauses, explored by Masood Ahmed
  • The nature of dispute resolution clauses.
  • The lessons to be learned from a number of recent decisions.

Dispute resolution clauses (also referred to as tiered dispute resolution clauses or escalation clauses) are becoming increasingly common in commercial agreements and it is clear that the courts will uphold and enforce such clauses.

Nature of dispute resolution clauses

Dispute resolution clauses typically require the parties to exhaust various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures before they are permitted to commence court or arbitration proceedings and the courts have recognised and enforced dispute resolution clauses (Cable & Wireless Plc v IBM United Kingdom Ltd [2002] EWHC 2059 (Comm), [2002] 2 All ER (Comm) 1041). In Holloway v Chancery Mead Ltd [2007] EWHC 2495 (TCC), [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 653 Mr Justice Ramsey helpfully identified three procedural requirements for dispute resolution clauses to be enforceable:

  • the process must be sufficiently certain;
  • the administrative processes for selecting a party to
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll