header-logo header-logo

Diversity Table recession proof

14 January 2010
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

BSN Diversity League Table boosted by 20% increase on 2009 entries

Entries for the Diversity League Table increased in 2009 despite the effects of the recession.

The table, now in its fourth year, is produced by the Black Solicitors Network (BSN). It surveys participating firms on gender and ethnic minority (EM) representation. For the first time, the compilers of the survey included data on sexual orientation and disability. Barristers’ chambers also made their debut in the table.

A total of 49 law firms took part, a 20% increase on last year. Some 23 out of 60 chambers approached for the survey agreed to take part. Best practice case studies, interviews with key legal figures and examples of diversity initiatives are included in the table.

One Garden Court scored highest among chambers taking part, followed by 25 Bedford Row and Tooks Chambers in joint second place.Thompsons had the highest ranking of participating law firms, followed by Wedlake Bell and Russell Jones and Walker.

Overall, ethnic minorities are represented by nearly 14% of trainees, nearly 9% of associates and 3.5% of partners. Women account for 55% of associates and 22% of partners.

Solicitor Michael Webster, editor of the table, says: “The data tells the story; whilst there are many positives, the league table also highlights a decrease in the numbers of ethnic minority lawyers across many areas. So there is still some way to go.

“Maybe we need to start looking more closely at the actual impact of some of the initiatives which attempt to attract more ethnic minority lawyers to the profession. It is also important to look at what initiatives exist to assist in the retention of ethnic minority lawyers as it is the percentages at the associate and partner levels within the leading firms which are decreasing.”

David Edmonds, chairman of the Legal Services Board, said: “I believe the profession must now start to create a universal framework to measure the effectiveness of the many laudable initiatives being undertaken across the sector—both to chart the impact of current programmes and to identify where the gaps are and to start to tackle them.

“I welcome the fact that this League Table shifts the emphasis onto what is actually being achieved and how achievement can be measured.”

Issue: 7400 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll