header-logo header-logo

16 June 2011
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Divorce—Bankruptcy

Mekarska v Ruiz and another [2011] EWHC 913 (Fam), [2011] All ER (D) 14 (Jun)

It was settled law that a court had to consider whether, on any grounds that had existed at the time that the order was made, that order ought not to have been made. A court might annul a bankruptcy order if it concluded that, on the date of that order, the bankrupt had been able to pay his debts. It would not normally be right to annul a bankruptcy order unless, at least, it was shown that as at the date of the order the debtor was in fact able to pay his debts, or had some tangible and immediate prospect of being able to do so which had since been fulfilled or would so have been but for the order itself.

A wife’s home rights endured until they were brought to an end by an order of the court, whether in the divorce proceedings or by an order in the bankruptcy proceedings under s 335A or s 336(2)(b) of the Insolvency Act 1986.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll