header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Divorce law update

Charman and special contribution >>
TRUSTEES IN BANkRUPTCY >>
equal division of assets >>

 

Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503, [2007] All ER (D) 425 (May)

The much publicised appeal by Mr Charman of an Order made by Mr Justice Coleridge on 27 June 2006 was heard between 6 to 8 March 2007 before the president of the Family Division, Lord Justice Thorpe and Lord Justice Wilson. A judgment of the court was handed down on 24 May 2007.
The parties were married for nearly 28 years. They had two children aged 24 and 20. Mr Charman had enjoyed an extremely successful career in insurance. Coleridge J found that the parties’ assets amounted to £131m of which, upon the agreed basis that Mr Charman would transfer his interest in the former matrimonial home to Mrs Charman, Mrs Charman held £8m and Mr Charman held £123m. Mrs Charman conceded that Mr Charman’s financial contribution had been of such magnitude as to justify a departure from equality. Coleridge J ordered that Mr Charman should make a lump

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll