header-logo header-logo

17 July 2015 / Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

DMC: not quite dead?

nlj_7661_briggs

Aidan Briggs explains why donatio mortis causa is an exception to nearly every rule

June Margaret Fairbrother was a consummate animal-lover, keeping cats and dogs and supporting several animal charities. In 1998 she made a will leaving the bulk of her estate between seven charities, including the Chiltern Dog Rescue and Redwings Horse Sanctuary, the appellants. Mr King, her nephew, led a less enviable life. He was bankrupted in 1990 and again in 2000. In 2005 he was convicted of acting as a company director despite being disqualified, and spent three months at Her Majesty’s pleasure. He separated from his wife and, in 2007, moved in with his aunt who was increasingly frail.

Mr King claimed that his aunt promised him her home after her death. She wrote a short note in 2010 leaving him her home “in the hope that he will care for my animals after my death”—the note was not a valid will.

At about the same time a conversation took place in which the testatrix presented her nephew with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll