header-logo header-logo

16 February 2015
Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

DNA tests to be funded

All family court judges will be given powers to order and fund DNA tests to determine a child’s parentage, from September.

Public funding for DNA, alcohol and drug testing was removed by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. However, anecdotal evidence suggested the lack of tests was causing delays in private family cases, particularly where parentage was in question.

Two pilot DNA testing schemes were set up in Taunton and Bristol last year. The results were positive, suggesting judges could be more confident when making decisions about children and, most importantly, parents would be more likely to follow the court’s orders.

David Nicholson, a director at DNA Legal, which took part in the pilots, says: “The individuals involved were generally grateful to have the tests as it cut down on delays. 

“It helps everyone—the court, the parties involved and litigants in person. Previously, court hearings were being delayed because people could not afford the tests.”

The pilots also explored the use of alcohol and drug tests in family court cases. These results were inconclusive, so the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) is to test and develop a new, affordable model for delivering drugs and alcohol testing over the coming months.

Justice Minister Simon Hughes says: “Unambiguous and conclusive DNA tests will prove parentage and help to end acrimonious and embarrassing court battles.”

Meanwhile, it was announced this week that the Department for Education is to fund further Family Drug and Alcohol Courts (FDACs) in England. Currently FDACs can be found in London, Gloucestershire and Milton Keynes.

Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll