header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026 / Megan Freeman , Catherine Doherty Montanaro
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Do cohabitees fare better after death than separation?

254469
© Getty images
Megan Freeman & Catherine Doherty Montanaro explore the paradox at the heart of cohabitation law
  • Cohabitees have limited financial remedies on separation but may have broader claims following a partner’s death.
  • The contrast between lifetime and post-death legal frameworks strengthens the case for reform of cohabitation law.

Cohabitation has been the fastest‑growing family form in England and Wales over the past decade, with Office for National Statistics data showing marked increases in cohabiting couples since 2012. Within the family law sphere, the incongruence between the growing number of cohabiting couples and the rights of those unmarried couples, has long been a point of contention. Nearly two decades ago, the Law Commission began making recommendations for statutory protections for separating cohabiting couples.

The disconnect has gained more than just academic recognition. In 2022, the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee conducted a comprehensive inquiry, concluding the existing law leaves cohabitees vulnerable, and recommending the introduction of an ‘opt-out’ statutory regime. Despite lobbying by academics,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll