header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026 / Megan Freeman , Catherine Doherty Montanaro
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Do cohabitees fare better after death than separation?

254469
© Getty images
Megan Freeman & Catherine Doherty Montanaro explore the paradox at the heart of cohabitation law
  • Cohabitees have limited financial remedies on separation but may have broader claims following a partner’s death.
  • The contrast between lifetime and post-death legal frameworks strengthens the case for reform of cohabitation law.

Cohabitation has been the fastest‑growing family form in England and Wales over the past decade, with Office for National Statistics data showing marked increases in cohabiting couples since 2012. Within the family law sphere, the incongruence between the growing number of cohabiting couples and the rights of those unmarried couples, has long been a point of contention. Nearly two decades ago, the Law Commission began making recommendations for statutory protections for separating cohabiting couples.

The disconnect has gained more than just academic recognition. In 2022, the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee conducted a comprehensive inquiry, concluding the existing law leaves cohabitees vulnerable, and recommending the introduction of an ‘opt-out’ statutory regime. Despite lobbying by academics,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll