header-logo header-logo

06 March 2008 / B. Mahendra
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

COMPETING RIGHTS
SCIENCE v FACTS
POST-DISCIPLINE SANCTIONS

FLYING UNSEEN

Most individuals are dependent on employment for their income. Illness of diverse kinds may impair the ability to work; the individual’s income may then become compromised and the law in many situations may begin to take an interest. This is usually the stuff of personal injury law, where employment prospects in the future—in the face of injuries sustained as a result of some tortious act—have to be studied with some care as any compensation payable must obviously reflect probable future loss.

In ancillary proceedings following divorce, the earning potential of ex-spouses is clearly a consideration especially where illness has afflicted one or both spouses. Lay persons often confuse recovery from illness with the full resumption of the capacity to work. The reality may be somewhat different. An individual may recover from some disorder but the prospects for his future employment may remain unclear and unpredictable. This situation played an important part in the Court of Appeal’s deliberations in v (

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll