header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

06 March 2008 / B. Mahendra
Issue: 7311 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Mental health
printer mail-detail

COMPETING RIGHTS
SCIENCE v FACTS
POST-DISCIPLINE SANCTIONS

FLYING UNSEEN

Most individuals are dependent on employment for their income. Illness of diverse kinds may impair the ability to work; the individual’s income may then become compromised and the law in many situations may begin to take an interest. This is usually the stuff of personal injury law, where employment prospects in the future—in the face of injuries sustained as a result of some tortious act—have to be studied with some care as any compensation payable must obviously reflect probable future loss.

In ancillary proceedings following divorce, the earning potential of ex-spouses is clearly a consideration especially where illness has afflicted one or both spouses. Lay persons often confuse recovery from illness with the full resumption of the capacity to work. The reality may be somewhat different. An individual may recover from some disorder but the prospects for his future employment may remain unclear and unpredictable. This situation played an important part in the Court of Appeal’s deliberations in v ( 2007)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll