header-logo header-logo

04 January 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

B Mahendra discusses notorious inquests and anomalies in criminal cases

Inquest expertise

Death may hold its terrors but those appear to be nothing compared to the problems that can arise when an inquest is held into its circumstances. A coroner’s inquest into a sudden or unnatural death faces many pitfalls. Inadequate investigation of the cause of death is the usual reason for the difficulty. If the body has been released for cremation rather than burial there may be little scope for later repair of evidential inadequacy. Grieving relations as well as the general public may be left with a sense of unease. Criminal investigation may be thwarted. Two recent inquests, both of which had reached public consciousness through media publicity, involved some of these issues.

Howlett v HM Coroner for Devon and Holcroft [2006] EWHC 2570 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 46 (Oct) involved the case of Rachel Whitear who was found dead, aged 21, in a bedsit in Exmouth. She had been a heroin addict. Her parents, determined to ensure she had not died in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll