header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Doc brief

NO FAULT TRAGEDY >>
HIDDEN VIOLENCE >>
CONFLICT IN CHILD PROTECTION >>
INTERIM DISCIPLINE >>

NO FAULT TRAGEDY

In Sutcliffe v BMI Healthcare Ltd (2007) EWCA Civ 476, Mr Sutcliffe had been a keen amateur rugby football player, aged 33, who underwent a routine operation on his injured knee. The operation was performed successfully and he appeared to be making an uneventful recovery—although naturally suffering pain which he controlled through standard self-administered doses of morphine. He spent a sleepless night and fell asleep at 6.00am, when the decision was taken to let him sleep undisturbed. At 8.15am he still seemed to be in untroubled sleep. At some point thereafter he appears to have vomited and, whereas the normal reaction would have been to have woken up, coughed and removed any obstruction to the airways, Mr Sutcliffe’s reactions, perhaps dulled by the morphine, had been impaired with the consequence that the vomited matter had entered his lungs, obstructing the flow of oxygen. As a consequence he suffered massive brain damage from which he will not recover.

Breaches in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll