header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

22 May 2008 / B. Mahendra
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Mental health
printer mail-detail

News

How far a tortfeasor can be held responsible for his actions or omissions in causing an injury was the issue exercising the House of Lords in Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd (2008) UKHL 13, [2008] All ER (D) 386 (Feb).

 

The facts were straightforward. Thomas Corr had suffered a serious accident at work. The defendants had admitted liability. As a result of the accident and ensuing physical injuries, he had developed a severe depressive illness which responded poorly to treatment and got worse. One day, in despair, he jumped from the top of a multi-storey car park and killed himself. His widow claimed damages for the physical and psychiatric injuries he had suffered. While the principles applicable to her claim were clear enough, the claim for recovery of financial loss due to her husband’s suicide was in issue.

The defendants asserted that his suicide was outside their duty of care, that it was too remote, that it could not have been reasonably foreseen and that the fatal act had broken

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
back-to-top-scroll