header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

22 May 2008 / B. Mahendra
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Mental health
printer mail-detail

News

How far a tortfeasor can be held responsible for his actions or omissions in causing an injury was the issue exercising the House of Lords in Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd (2008) UKHL 13, [2008] All ER (D) 386 (Feb).

 

The facts were straightforward. Thomas Corr had suffered a serious accident at work. The defendants had admitted liability. As a result of the accident and ensuing physical injuries, he had developed a severe depressive illness which responded poorly to treatment and got worse. One day, in despair, he jumped from the top of a multi-storey car park and killed himself. His widow claimed damages for the physical and psychiatric injuries he had suffered. While the principles applicable to her claim were clear enough, the claim for recovery of financial loss due to her husband’s suicide was in issue.

The defendants asserted that his suicide was outside their duty of care, that it was too remote, that it could not have been reasonably foreseen and that the fatal act had

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll