header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 May 2008 / B. Mahendra
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Malice in the Hospital

Health care staff are subject to numerous forms of informal assessment and comment on their performance and conduct quite apart from the occasions on which formal references for purposes of employment are written upon them.

 

The individuals concerned occasionally seek the advice of their professional bodies, trades unions and defence societies but matters are not taken any farther normally. It must be rare for a healthcare worker to bring an action in libel on these occasions but that is what happened in Akinleye v East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust (2008) EWHC 68, [2008] All ER (D) 180 (Jan).

 

Mr Akinleye, although he was medically qualified, worked as a technician carrying out support functions in the cardiology department of a hospital. He worked through an agency which supplied him to various hospitals where these functions needed to be performed. It seems one hospital where he worked contacted another to enquire about his work and conduct.

 

A manager in a cardiology department noted, by way of an

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll