header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / B. Mahendra
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Doc Brief

News

An important aspect of legal process is, of course, procedural fairness, as much applicable to professional disciplinary proceedings as to other trials. We now also have the additional requirement imposed by Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) that provides that “everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable period of time”. The question of undue delay was the issue that primarly exercised the

Administrative Court
in Selvarajan v General Medical Council( 2008) EWHC 182 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 110 (Feb). Dr Selvarajan was a general practitioner who was alleged to have defrauded the local health authority of £150,000 by falsely prescribing drugs, sharing the spoils with a local chemist who had purported to have dispensed the drugs. These activities took place between 1994 and 1996. It was only in March 2006 that the General Medical Council (GMC) got around to imposing the sanction of erasure from the medical register on the doctor. He appealed on the ground that the GMC had misdirected itself on the relevance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll