header-logo header-logo

Doc Brief

22 May 2008 / B. Mahendra
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

News

An important aspect of legal process is, of course, procedural fairness, as much applicable to professional disciplinary proceedings as to other trials. We now also have the additional requirement imposed by Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) that provides that “everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable period of time”. The question of undue delay was the issue that primarly exercised the

Administrative Court
in Selvarajan v General Medical Council( 2008) EWHC 182 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 110 (Feb). Dr Selvarajan was a general practitioner who was alleged to have defrauded the local health authority of £150,000 by falsely prescribing drugs, sharing the spoils with a local chemist who had purported to have dispensed the drugs. These activities took place between 1994 and 1996. It was only in March 2006 that the General Medical Council (GMC) got around to imposing the sanction of erasure from the medical register on the doctor. He appealed on the ground that the GMC had misdirected itself on
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll