header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008 / B Mahendra
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Doc brief

Trauma
Assessment
Mental Disorder

Earnings loss after trauma

In Jones (Administratrix of the Estate of Bron Bawdon- Jones) v Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust [2008] EWHC 558, [2008] All ER (D) 313 (Mar), the claimant, then aged 31, had given birth to a baby girl. It had been a protracted and complicated labour, the baby eventually being delivered by vacuum extraction. It had suffered severe brain damage as a result of lack of oxygen. It was said to have been effectively dead at birth but had been resuscitated. The prognosis was hopeless and life support had been turned off after she had survived just 25 hours.

The defendants had admitted breach of duty. The issue was in relation to damages for personal injury sought by the claimant who alleged significant and ongoing psychiatric injury and consequential losses including loss of earnings and pension loss. The defendants contested these claims with vigour.

Conflicting evidence
The psychiatric evidence that was produced was conflicting. One expert had said the claimant had suffered post traumatic stress

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll