header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011 / Emma Davies
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Doctor, doctor

Emma Davies prescribes a regulatory health check

There has been a spate of recent announcements from the coalition government regarding reducing the regulatory burden on businesses, including  the Red Tape Challenge where once a fortnight, the government invites comments on regulations affecting a particular sector (manufacturing is next), in the hope of simplifying or even removing those posing the greatest burden.

Alongside this, there is an ongoing consultation on health and safety laws, and the “One-In-One-Out” policy requires the impact of any proposed regulation to be calculated, and before it can be introduced, requires the repeal of any equally costly existing regulation. This ensures that any new regulations are cost-neutral for businesses in terms of compliance. The caveat to this is that not every business is equally affected by every regulation—so the net effect for some businesses may be less neutral than for others.

But there are some areas where it is likely that regulation will always remain—principally where safety is concerned—and rather than reducing regulation in these areas, the government intends that these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll