header-logo header-logo

Doctor, doctor

07 July 2011 / Emma Davies
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Emma Davies prescribes a regulatory health check

There has been a spate of recent announcements from the coalition government regarding reducing the regulatory burden on businesses, including  the Red Tape Challenge where once a fortnight, the government invites comments on regulations affecting a particular sector (manufacturing is next), in the hope of simplifying or even removing those posing the greatest burden.

Alongside this, there is an ongoing consultation on health and safety laws, and the “One-In-One-Out” policy requires the impact of any proposed regulation to be calculated, and before it can be introduced, requires the repeal of any equally costly existing regulation. This ensures that any new regulations are cost-neutral for businesses in terms of compliance. The caveat to this is that not every business is equally affected by every regulation—so the net effect for some businesses may be less neutral than for others.

But there are some areas where it is likely that regulation will always remain—principally where safety is concerned—and rather than reducing regulation in these areas, the government intends that these

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll