header-logo header-logo

28 February 2025 / Professor Sukhninder Panesar
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Health
printer mail-detail

Does compassion defeat inheritance rights?

209434
The application of the forfeiture rule in assisted dying cases: Sukhninder Panesar examines a delicate balancing act for the courts
  • The Forfeiture Act 1982 confers upon the court a discretion to grant relief against the forfeiture of inheritance rights.
  • The forfeiture rule has become a source of much debate in the context of assisted dying cases.
  • The development of the case law shows that the courts will not take such decisions lightly, and a very high threshold of evidence is required in such cases.

The principle of law is that no person may benefit from killing another person. The matter is neatly illustrated in the decision of Sir Samuel Evans P in Re Crippen’s Estate [1911] P 108. Sir Samuel Evans P explained that it ‘is clear that the law is, that no person can obtain, or enforce, any rights resulting to him from his own crime; neither can his representative, claiming under him, obtain or enforce any such rights. The human mind revolts at the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll