header-logo header-logo

21 October 2014
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Dr Julia Schönbohm—Linklaters

Patent litigation expert joins firm's Frankfurt office

On 1 December, Dr Julia Schönbohm will join Linklaters’ dispute resolution division as a partner in the firm’s Frankfurt office. She joins from DLA Piper, where she established and headed the German patent litigation practice. 

Julia is a highly regarded expert in cross-border patent infringement matters, advising on projects across all aspects of technology. She also advises on high-level trademark and competition law transactions.

Linklaters’ German senior partner Dr Carl-Peter Feick says: “Julia is a very experienced lawyer who has valuable sector knowledge and an excellent network. Her expertise in patent infringement proceedings will help us to develop our dispute resolution division further in line with the law firm’s growth in the field.”

Dr Rupert Bellinghausen, head of the German dispute resolution practice, concludes: “Julia is an excellent addition to our team. As we are expanding, our objective is to represent our clients in any significant cross-border court, arbitration and mediation proceeding. We are now also able to do so in patent litigation matters in Germany, an internationally important place of jurisdiction. This fits our global strategy perfectly.”

Julia says: “As innovation is the driver for growth and innovative enterprises are operating on an international scale, Linklaters’ clients seek cross-border advice. Linklaters offers the opportunity to be part of an outstanding, truly international team and to promote the German dispute resolution division by providing new momentum from the IP side. I am excited to take on these new challenges.”

 

Issue: 7627 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll