header-logo header-logo

Due diligence & expert opinions

22 September 2023 / Simon Berney-Edwards
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
138384
Simon Berney-Edwards underlines the importance of providing experts with all the evidence they need to ensure their opinions pass muster
  • Those instructing care experts must ensure that they have been provided with all the necessary evidence to ensure that they can fully address the issues, and that their opinions are fully justified and tested against the realities of life.

The recent judgment by Mr Justice Cotter in the case of Scarcliffe v Brampton Valley Group Ltd [2023] EWHC 1565 (KB) provides important direction and lessons to be learned for expert witnesses and those instructing them.

This claim arose out of an accident in 2017 in which Mr Scarcliffe, a tree surgeon, suffered two spinal fractures when a colleague lost control of a solid section of tree trunk, and it fell on him. Judgment had been found in favour of Mr Scarcliffe, and the proceedings in question were therefore specifically to assess damages. The claim detailed significant requirements going forward as two of his five children are disabled. The original claim was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll