header-logo header-logo

14 January 2014 / Daniel Kavan
Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice , Jackson
printer mail-detail

E-disclosure: health check

Daniel Kavan advises how to keep ahead of the regulators where e-discovery is concerned

The risk of a European organisation receiving a hefty fine in relation to behaviour of its employees is significant. The European Commission’s cartel division imposed 1,882 million Euros in fines in 2013 (European Commission, Statistics on Cartels, updated 5 December 2013). In the UK, the Office of Fair Trading is currently looking into 14 different sectors and products, pursuant to its powers under the Competition Act 1998 (Office of Fair Trading, Competition Act Investigations—current), and the Financial Conduct Authority issued over £474 million in fines last year.

Even in industries which are not susceptible to breaches of competition law and are not regulated by the financial authorities, there are plenty of regulators ready to pounce on other behavioural issues such as money laundering, bribery and fraud. These issues also have a significant effect on the internal costs of running a business. On average, European companies lose 1.2% of revenue due to fraud (Kroll Global Fraud Report Annual Edition 2013-2014

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll