header-logo header-logo

E-disclosure: health check

14 January 2014 / Daniel Kavan
Categories: Features , E-disclosure , Procedure & practice , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Daniel Kavan advises how to keep ahead of the regulators where e-discovery is concerned

The risk of a European organisation receiving a hefty fine in relation to behaviour of its employees is significant. The European Commission’s cartel division imposed 1,882 million Euros in fines in 2013 (European Commission, Statistics on Cartels, updated 5 December 2013). In the UK, the Office of Fair Trading is currently looking into 14 different sectors and products, pursuant to its powers under the Competition Act 1998 (Office of Fair Trading, Competition Act Investigations—current), and the Financial Conduct Authority issued over £474 million in fines last year.

Even in industries which are not susceptible to breaches of competition law and are not regulated by the financial authorities, there are plenty of regulators ready to pounce on other behavioural issues such as money laundering, bribery and fraud. These issues also have a significant effect on the internal costs of running a business. On average, European companies lose 1.2% of revenue due to fraud (Kroll Global Fraud Report Annual Edition 2013-2014

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll