header-logo header-logo

04 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Easement

England Environmental (Northern) Ltd and another v Arthur Jones & Sons (Contractors) Ltd [2017] EWHC 1903 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 199 (Jul)

In a dispute concerning two neighbouring properties, the Chancery Division held that the claimants (respectively the owner and periodic tenant of one of the properties) were entitled to a right of way over a lane on the basis of the doctrine of lost modern grant. Under that doctrine, an easement could be acquired by 20 years continuous use ‘as of right’. The court, in awarding the claimants damages of £500, held that the requirement of the doctrine had been satisfied in circumstances where there had been more than 20 years of continuous use of the lane to gain access to the first claimant’s property.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll