header-logo header-logo

An education in charity

24 January 2008 / Nicholas Hancox
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Where’s the public benefit of subsidising the education of wealthy children? Asks Nicholas Hancox

The advancement of education has been recognised in statute as a charitable activity since the Statute of Charitable Uses 1601. The Charities Act 2006 (ChaA 2006) is the current incarnation of the 1601 law and what is new in the Act is the public benefit test (expected to be in force in March 2008) under which the “advancement of education” may fail to retain its charitable status if it produces insufficient public benefit as that term is defined, not in ChaA 2006, but at common law. The Charity Commission is expressly charged with a duty to draw attention to the operation of the new public benefit test (ChaA 2006, s 7, prospectively inserting a new s 1B into the Charities Act 1993) and the commission has started already, issuing a full-scale consultation document, Draft Public Benefit Guidance, last year and the first tranche of official guidance, Charities and Public Benefit, earlier this month. More guidance will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll