header-logo header-logo

24 January 2008 / Nicholas Hancox
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

An education in charity

Where’s the public benefit of subsidising the education of wealthy children? Asks Nicholas Hancox

The advancement of education has been recognised in statute as a charitable activity since the Statute of Charitable Uses 1601. The Charities Act 2006 (ChaA 2006) is the current incarnation of the 1601 law and what is new in the Act is the public benefit test (expected to be in force in March 2008) under which the “advancement of education” may fail to retain its charitable status if it produces insufficient public benefit as that term is defined, not in ChaA 2006, but at common law. The Charity Commission is expressly charged with a duty to draw attention to the operation of the new public benefit test (ChaA 2006, s 7, prospectively inserting a new s 1B into the Charities Act 1993) and the commission has started already, issuing a full-scale consultation document, Draft Public Benefit Guidance, last year and the first tranche of official guidance, Charities and Public Benefit, earlier this month. More guidance will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll