header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Education

R (on the application of B) v Islington London Borough Council [2010] All ER (D) 97 (Aug)

On its true construction, Pt IV to the Education Act 1996 only required a local education authority to maintain a statement of special educational needs until a person’s 19th birthday. At that point, the authority had no further obligations under that statute. Further, where a statement lapsed because a child had reached the age of 19, there was no obligation on a local authority to make a determination that the statement had lapsed.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft further builds national Professional Liability practice, hiring two partners in Bristol

NEWS
A child’s views can be taken into account during international child abduction proceedings, the Supreme Court has held
Small and medium-sized law firms have urged regulators to pause plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
Lawyers have raised the alarm on employment tribunal delays and backlogs, with some cases facing a three-year wait for a hearing
The controversial assisted dying Bill has drawn to a halt after MPs defeated it by 286 votes to 270
MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)
back-to-top-scroll