header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Education

R (on the application of B) v Islington London Borough Council [2010] All ER (D) 97 (Aug)

On its true construction, Pt IV to the Education Act 1996 only required a local education authority to maintain a statement of special educational needs until a person’s 19th birthday. At that point, the authority had no further obligations under that statute. Further, where a statement lapsed because a child had reached the age of 19, there was no obligation on a local authority to make a determination that the statement had lapsed.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll