header-logo header-logo

17 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Education secretary forced to reconsider spending cuts

Decision to revoke £1bn of funding for school repairs unlawful

Decision to revoke £1bn of funding for school repairs unlawful
A High Court judge has quashed Education Secretary Michael Gove’s proposal to cancel funding for schools under the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme.

BSF, which began in 2004, aimed to rebuild or refurbish schools across the entire secondary school estate.

The secretary of state revoked £1bn of funding and adopted “rules-based criteria” to determine which school repairs should go ahead and which should be stopped.

In R (Luton Borough Council and Ors v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), six local authorities challenged Gove’s decision on the basis he had failed to conduct proper consultation, to consider their individual circumstances and to comply with his duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the Race Relations Act 1976.

They contended that he had acted irrationally and had breached their legitimate expectation that funding would continue.

The six authorities, represented by barristers from Brick Court Chambers, had built schools

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll