header-logo header-logo

17 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Education secretary forced to reconsider spending cuts

Decision to revoke £1bn of funding for school repairs unlawful

Decision to revoke £1bn of funding for school repairs unlawful
A High Court judge has quashed Education Secretary Michael Gove’s proposal to cancel funding for schools under the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme.

BSF, which began in 2004, aimed to rebuild or refurbish schools across the entire secondary school estate.

The secretary of state revoked £1bn of funding and adopted “rules-based criteria” to determine which school repairs should go ahead and which should be stopped.

In R (Luton Borough Council and Ors v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), six local authorities challenged Gove’s decision on the basis he had failed to conduct proper consultation, to consider their individual circumstances and to comply with his duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the Race Relations Act 1976.

They contended that he had acted irrationally and had breached their legitimate expectation that funding would continue.

The six authorities, represented by barristers from Brick Court Chambers, had built schools

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll