header-logo header-logo

17 February 2011
Issue: 7453 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Education secretary forced to reconsider spending cuts

Decision to revoke £1bn of funding for school repairs unlawful

Decision to revoke £1bn of funding for school repairs unlawful
A High Court judge has quashed Education Secretary Michael Gove’s proposal to cancel funding for schools under the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme.

BSF, which began in 2004, aimed to rebuild or refurbish schools across the entire secondary school estate.

The secretary of state revoked £1bn of funding and adopted “rules-based criteria” to determine which school repairs should go ahead and which should be stopped.

In R (Luton Borough Council and Ors v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin), six local authorities challenged Gove’s decision on the basis he had failed to conduct proper consultation, to consider their individual circumstances and to comply with his duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the Race Relations Act 1976.

They contended that he had acted irrationally and had breached their legitimate expectation that funding would continue.

The six authorities, represented by barristers from Brick Court Chambers, had built schools

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll