header-logo header-logo

Education—Special education needs—Age at which statement of special education needs lapses

24 November 2011
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Williams v Essex County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1315, [2011] All ER (D) 127 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Maurice Kay, Moses LJJ and Baron J, 15 Nov 2011

A statement of special educational needs automatically lapses when a person turns 19 years of age, and thereby ceases to be a child.

Fiona Scolding (instructed by Essex County Council) for the authority. David Wolfe (instructed by Levenes) for the claimant.

The claimant was born in August 1989. She had Down’s Syndrome, and her functional age was about 10 years or less. In February 2008, the defendant local authority wrote to the claimant’s parents stating that they would cease to maintain the statement of special educational needs after she turned 19. The parents did not accept that decision. In subsequent proceedings the issue arose as to the age at which a local authority’s responsibilities in respect of maintaining a statement came to an end.

Baron J

The issue was of general importance because

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll