header-logo header-logo

Education—Special education needs—Age at which statement of special education needs lapses

24 November 2011
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Williams v Essex County Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1315, [2011] All ER (D) 127 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Maurice Kay, Moses LJJ and Baron J, 15 Nov 2011

A statement of special educational needs automatically lapses when a person turns 19 years of age, and thereby ceases to be a child.

Fiona Scolding (instructed by Essex County Council) for the authority. David Wolfe (instructed by Levenes) for the claimant.

The claimant was born in August 1989. She had Down’s Syndrome, and her functional age was about 10 years or less. In February 2008, the defendant local authority wrote to the claimant’s parents stating that they would cease to maintain the statement of special educational needs after she turned 19. The parents did not accept that decision. In subsequent proceedings the issue arose as to the age at which a local authority’s responsibilities in respect of maintaining a statement came to an end.

Baron J

The issue was of general importance because

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll