header-logo header-logo

20 February 2015
Issue: 7641 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Elections

McHugh and others v United Kingdom (App No 51987/08) [2015] ECHR 51987/08, [2015] All ER (D) 95 (Feb)

The 1,015 applicant serving prisoners complained that they were prevented from voting in elections, relying on Art 3 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights, in allowing the application, held that there had been a violation of Art 3, given that the impugned legislation remained unamended after the court’s decision in Greens v United Kingdom (App No 60041/08) [2010] All ER (D) 280 (Nov), which had required amendment to render the electoral law compatible with the requirements of the Convention.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll