header-logo header-logo

14 March 2014
Issue: 7598 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Electricity

National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc v Arnold White Estates Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 216, [2014] All ER (D) 16 (Mar)

The right to compensation under para 7(1) of Sch 4 to the Act was conferred in general language. The only limitation which might be said to flow from the language used was that the loss for which compensation was claimed had to be loss suffered by the claimant in his capacity as owner or occupier of the land, rather than in some wholly unrelated capacity. The established authorities had repeatedly emphasised that it was by reference to the value to the owner of the land being acquired that compensation was quantified, rather than its objective market value. That principle was fully applicable to the grant of wayleaves. In the instant case, the loss of a contractual right to proceeds of the sale of the land under a conditional contract, where the contract had fallen away because of the grant of the wayleave, had been fairly and squarely a loss suffered by the respondent in its capacity as owner

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll