header-logo header-logo

Electronic persons: time for a new legal personality?

11 August 2017 / David Kidman , Stephen Turner
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Technology
printer mail-detail
05_kidman

Product liability law has to get to grips with the emerging complexities of artificial intelligence, say David Kidman & Stephen Turner

  • Smart technology, with interconnected devices speaking to each other, makes it difficult to establish liability

In May 2017, the European Commission published the results of a public consultation on the fitness for purpose of the Product Liability Directive (enacted in the UK by the Consumer Protection Act 1987). Many questions set by the Commission related to the Directive’s application to smart objects, robots and new tech. Approximately two-thirds of respondents agreed that producers of software, apps and algorithms should potentially be held liable, but that there are difficulties allocating liability in respect of products interacting with other products or services (eg smartphone malfunction due to an app) and in respect of products operating on algorithms (eg cars with parking sensors), including self-learning algorithms (AI).

Crucially, 58.33% of respondents did not agree that there should be liability exemptions for innovative products under experimentation, indicating that consumers would resist

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll