header-logo header-logo

Electronic persons: time for a new legal personality?

11 August 2017 / David Kidman , Stephen Turner
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Features , Insurance surgery , Technology
printer mail-detail
05_kidman

Product liability law has to get to grips with the emerging complexities of artificial intelligence, say David Kidman & Stephen Turner

  • Smart technology, with interconnected devices speaking to each other, makes it difficult to establish liability

In May 2017, the European Commission published the results of a public consultation on the fitness for purpose of the Product Liability Directive (enacted in the UK by the Consumer Protection Act 1987). Many questions set by the Commission related to the Directive’s application to smart objects, robots and new tech. Approximately two-thirds of respondents agreed that producers of software, apps and algorithms should potentially be held liable, but that there are difficulties allocating liability in respect of products interacting with other products or services (eg smartphone malfunction due to an app) and in respect of products operating on algorithms (eg cars with parking sensors), including self-learning algorithms (AI).

Crucially, 58.33% of respondents did not agree that there should be liability exemptions for innovative products under experimentation,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll