header-logo header-logo

13 February 2015
Issue: 7640 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Elliott Vigar introduces Veyo – the future of online conveyancing

elliott_veo

The first national research survey of its kind, which was carried out by a leading independent market research company, reveals some fascinating insight into what consumers want from the conveyancing process. A key finding was that the most popular single change home buyers would like to see to improve the home buying process is a faster service. Of the 2,000 respondents recruited through an independent research panel who were asked this question, more opted for a quicker process than lower costs, fees and stamp duty.

Interestingly, a significant number of consumers are willing to pay more for a speedier service. With only 35% of respondents stating that they are unlikely to pay more, up to a quarter of respondents were readily willing to pay more for a quicker service and the remaining percentage were undecided.

One in 10 considers home buying to be the most stressful life event they have ever experienced, placing it above other life events such as a redundancy and having a baby for the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll