header-logo header-logo

11 June 2010
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Gledhill v Bently Designes (UK) Ltd [2010] All ER (D) 04 (Jun)

As a matter of law, abusive language by an employee towards his or her employer was capable of amounting to a repudiatory breach of contract depending on the circumstances. Words spoken in the heat of the moment might not always lead to a conclusion that they were such that the relationship could not continue, but in the context of what had been said and done might amount to a repudiatory breach.

An apology might lead to the conclusion that the conduct was not repudiatory but that was likely to be only the position where the words were spoken in heat and haste and the apology was heartfelt and sincere.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll