header-logo header-logo

11 June 2010
Issue: 7421 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Gledhill v Bently Designes (UK) Ltd [2010] All ER (D) 04 (Jun)

As a matter of law, abusive language by an employee towards his or her employer was capable of amounting to a repudiatory breach of contract depending on the circumstances. Words spoken in the heat of the moment might not always lead to a conclusion that they were such that the relationship could not continue, but in the context of what had been said and done might amount to a repudiatory breach.

An apology might lead to the conclusion that the conduct was not repudiatory but that was likely to be only the position where the words were spoken in heat and haste and the apology was heartfelt and sincere.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll