header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT

YMCA Training v Stewart [2007] IRLR 185

In determining whether the requirements of step one of the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure are met, it is necessary to look beneath the parties’ own labels and focus on whether the substantive requirements of the statute were met.

Tribunals must not be distracted by the fact that the parties may have been following an internal procedure with more elaborate requirements, and different terminology, from those required by the statute. It does not matter that the requirements of both step one and step two are addressed in the same letter. The statutory procedure permits the employer to present its case in two stages—stating the grounds first and supplying the basis for them later—but it does not oblige the employer to do so.

Employers may state both the grounds for the contemplated action and the basis of those grounds at the same time. It is inherent in the requirements of step two that the employer should not announce any decision until the employee has had the opportunity to put their case at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll