header-logo header-logo

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

R (on the application of Shoesmith) v Ofsted and others [2011] EWCA Civ 642, [2011] All ER (D) 293 (May)

The fact that the Children Act 2004, in creating the singular post of director of children’s services (DCS), identified as a matter of policy one individual with ultimate responsibility and accountability in relation to children’s services did not mean that that person was to be denied the protections that had long been accorded to responsible and accountable office-holders. Nor did the fact that the secretary of state was not the employer of a DCS relieve him of the obligation to be fair.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll