header-logo header-logo

10 November 2011
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Nolan v Balfour Beatty Engineering Services UKEAT/0109/11/SM, [2011] All ER (D) 09 (Nov)

When deciding what would have been a reasonable time within which to present a late claim, employment tribunals were required to bear in mind the context, namely a primary time limit of three months and the general principle that litigation should be progressed efficiently and without delay. They were then required to consider all the circumstances of the particular case, an exercise which would inevitably include taking account of what the claimant did and what he knew about time limits, what he, reasonably, ought to have known about them, and they were required to ask themselves why it was that the further delay had occurred.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
The controversial Mazur ruling, which caused widespread uncertainty about the role of non-solicitors in litigation work, has been overturned on appeal
Two landmark social media cases in the US could influence social media regulation in the UK, lawyers predict
Barristers have urged the government to set up Nightingale-style specialist courts, with jury trials, to prioritise rape, sexual assault and domestic abuse trials
Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer
Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned
back-to-top-scroll