header-logo header-logo

08 August 2013
Issue: 7572 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Jones v Governing Body of Story Wood School and Children’s Centre UKEAT/0522/12/JOJ, [2013] All ER (D) 334 (Jul)

It was settled law that when an employee resigned, the test for determining whether their resignation should be treated as their dismissal was not whether their employers had behaved unreasonably towards them, but whether their employers had broken their contract of employment in some fundamental way. In many cases, the term of the contract of employment which the employers were alleged to have broken was the implied term of trust and confidence, namely the term that the employers would not act towards the employee in such a way as was likely, or was intended, to destroy or damage seriously the trust and confidence between them which was at the heart of the working relationship between employer and employee. The question whether the employers had behaved reasonably came into its own when the fairness of the employee’s constructive dismissal was being addressed. It was a little artificial to have to ask what the reason for an employee’s dismissal had been in a case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll