header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 May 2016
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Gibbs v Leeds United Football Club Ltd [2016] EWHC 960 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 206 (Apr)

The Queen’s Bench Division held that the claimant was constructively dismissed, by reason of a repudiatory breach of contract by his employer Leeds United Football Club and therefore was entitled to damages for that breach less the amount of any bonuses to be received in respect of his current job.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
TheGazette LogoClick to know more
DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Pro bono’s silver lining
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
NLJ this week: Wrong expert, costly exit
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
NLJ this week: Time for judges to break their silence?
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
NLJ this week: Discounted damages, different costs
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
NLJ this week: Masks off—but police must follow the rules
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll