header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 May 2016
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Gibbs v Leeds United Football Club Ltd [2016] EWHC 960 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 206 (Apr)

The Queen’s Bench Division held that the claimant was constructively dismissed, by reason of a repudiatory breach of contract by his employer Leeds United Football Club and therefore was entitled to damages for that breach less the amount of any bonuses to be received in respect of his current job.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Speechlive LogoClick to know more
Browne Jacobson—Caroline Barker & Tom Walker

Browne Jacobson—Caroline Barker & Tom Walker

Browne Jacobson recruits regulatory experts Caroline Barker and Tom Walker to bolster health, government and corporates practices

Jackson Lees Group—Paul Harrison, Helen Innes & Sorcha McMullan

Jackson Lees Group—Paul Harrison, Helen Innes & Sorcha McMullan

Partner and paralegals bolster clinical negligence team at Jackson Lees Group

Stone King—Manchester

Stone King—Manchester

Stone King triples Manchester footprint with office move as law firm’s rapid growth journey continues

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Courtroom currents
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
NLJ this week: Privilege holds firm
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
NLJ this week: Sanctions tripwires
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
NLJ this week: Civil shifts
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
NLJ this week: Rules for robots
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll