header-logo header-logo

21 October 2016
Issue: 7719 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Turner and another v Alno UK Ltd UKEAT/0349/15/DA, [2016] All ER (D) 65 (Oct)

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (the EAT), in allowing the appellant franchiser’s appeal, held that the employment tribunal (the tribunal) had erred in finding that a transfer, under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) had taken place following the termination of a franchise by the second respondent franchisee. The EAT held that the tribunal had failed to apply the correct, multi-factorial, approach to the question of whether a transfer of the first respondent’s employment had actually taken place.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll