header-logo header-logo

02 June 2017
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

Hartley and others v King Edward VI College [2017] UKSC 39, [2017] All ER (D) 146 (May)

The Supreme Court, in allowing the appellants’ appeal, held that the correct interpretation of ‘accruing from day to day’ within s 2 of the Apportionment Act 1870 meant accruing calendar day by calendar day and that that principle could not be excluded in the present case upon the correct interpretation of the relevant employment contracts. The appellants had participated in one day or lawful strike action and had a deduction of their salary at a rate of 1/260 of their annual salary. It was held that that had been wrong and the rate ought to have been a deduction of 1/365 of their annual salary.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll