header-logo header-logo

18 January 2013
Issue: 7544 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment—Costs

Aldwinkle v Adecco (UK) Ltd UKEAT/0208/12/LA, [2013] All ER (D) 27 (Jan)

In a case where the primary source of evidence about means to pay was given by a party in person, their non-attendance might be very or highly relevant to the exercise of the discretion in r 41(3) of Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/1861). Non-attendance was a relevant consideration, the weight to be given to it on the exercise of the discretion was singularly a matter for the body charged with the exercise of that discretion.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
Non-court dispute resolution is no longer an alternative in family law—it is rapidly becoming the norm
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
back-to-top-scroll