header-logo header-logo

27 July 2009
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment law

Haritaki v South East England Development Agency [2008] IRLR 945 (EAT)

Pursuant to r 3 of the EAT Rules, if a judge decides that a notice of appeal discloses no reasonable grounds for bringing the appeal, the litigant has the options of lodging a new notice of appeal, usually to the same judge; or to apply for an oral hearing, usually before a different judge. These options are not mutually exclusive, in that a fresh notice of appeal can be put in if an oral hearing is unsuccessful, or an oral hearing can be requested if a fresh notice of appeal is unsuccessful.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll