header-logo header-logo

10 January 2014
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment—Summary judgment

Qantas Cabin Crew (UK) Ltd v Alsopp and others UKEAT/0318/13/SM, [2013] All ER (D) 246 (Dec)

It was settled law that although a case might turn out at trial not to be really complicated, it did not follow that it should be decided without fuller investigation into the facts at trial than is possible on an application for summary judgment. Accordingly, the court should hesitate about making a final decision without a trial. However, care should be exercised when the case concerned the construction of a written contract. The factual matrix was the key to understanding what the parties had intended by the words they used. If there was no conflict of evidence on a relevant point, it was only when there were reasonable grounds for supposing that a fuller investigation of the facts might make a difference, that the court should decline to construe the contract on summary judgment. 

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll