header-logo header-logo

England’s largest divorce settlement

30 December 2021
Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail
The decision in the Dubai aristocracy divorce case―believed to be the highest post-divorce financial settlement awarded by an English court―has a ‘relentless logic’, according to a lawyer who specialises in high value divorces

Mr Justice Moor in the High Court ordered Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum, the ruler of Dubai and vice president and prime minister of the UAE, to pay about £554m to his estranged wife Princess Haya, in HRH Haya Bint Al Hussein v His Highness Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum [2021] EWFC 94.

Princess Haya, who lives in London and Egham, is the daughter of the late King Hussein of Jordan and his third wife Queen Alia. She was the youngest of Sheikh Mohammed’s six wives, and the couple have two children. The settlement makes a lump sum payment of more than £250m to the Princess as well as provision for the personal security, including armoured vehicles for the family, education, a nurse, nanny, other staff, ponies and pets.

Divorce lawyer Henry Hood, partner at Lincoln’s Inn firm Hunters Law, said: ‘The judgment has a relentless logic in that it meets (albeit in amounts never before seen in an English court judgment) the ongoing lifelong need that the judge found to exist in circumstances where the funds existed to do so.

‘The actions found to have been perpetrated by the husband, including his readiness to use intelligence and eavesdropping equipment only available to sovereign states might have had their effect on the size of the award.’

The court has previously found Sheikh Mohammed illegally hacked the mobile phones of his wife, her bodyguards and legal team. Moor J said the family court’s fact-finding hearing before the President of the Family Division in November 2019, which the Sheikh did not attend or provide evidence to, made ‘very serious findings… including that HH [Sheikh Mohammed] had ordered and orchestrated the abduction of two of his elder children.’

Moor J said: ‘HRH [Princess Haya] had been placed in a position of great fear. HH had deliberately used his connections with the press to generate hostile stories aimed at destabilising her and harming her. He had published poems considered by HRH to be threatening, including one entitled “You lived; you died”. The President concluded that HH would use his very substantial powers to achieve his aims.’

Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Gilson Gray—Paul Madden

Partner appointed to head international insolvency and dispute resolution for England

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Brachers—Gill Turner Tucker

Kent firm expands regional footprint through strategic acquisition

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—William Charles

Financial disputes and investigations specialist joins as partner in London

NEWS
Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
back-to-top-scroll