header-logo header-logo

20 January 2009 / Stephen Hockman
Categories: Features , Public , Environment
printer mail-detail

Environmental matters

An overview of recent developments in environmental law, by Stephen Hockman QC

There are further encouraging signs of the courts’ willingness to recognise the importance of environmental concerns.

In R (on the application of Finn- Kelcey) v Milton Keynes Borough Council 2008 EWCA Civ 1067, [2008] All ER (D) 94 (Oct) a planning permission had been granted for a windfarm in Buckinghamshire comprising seven wind turbines.

The  background to this was PPS22 on renewable energy, which stresses the importance of renewable energy projects in the context of the UK target of generating 10% of electricity from renewable energy sources by 2010.

On an application for permission for judicial review to challenge the planning permission, in a claim initiated just within the three-month period, permission was refused on the grounds of delay as well as lack of substantive merit.

The Administrative Court held that the claim had not been made promptly, contrary to CPR Pt 54.5(1).

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision at fi rst instance, considering that in the context of renewable energy, where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll