header-logo header-logo

02 February 2012
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Equity—Receipt of trust property—Unconscionable receipt

Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 64 (Jan)

Chancery Division, Stephen Morris QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), 11 Jan 2012

The receipt by the defendant of European Union Allowances (EUAs) from the claimant occasioned by third party fraud was unconscionable in circumstances where the defendant willfully and recklessly failed to make such inquiries as an honest and reasonable man would make.

Luke Harris (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimant. Victor Joffe QC (instructed by Myers & Sons Solicitors) for the defendant.

The claimant was a company with its registered office in Germany. The defendant was a company registered in England. In January 2010, 21,000 carbon emission allowances known as European Union Allowances (EUAs) were transfered from the claimant’s own carbon emissions account at the German emissions trading scheme registry to the defendant’s carbon emissions account at the UK greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme registry. The transfer was effected as a result of an e-mail fraud perpetrated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll